Unicredit rights issue – a few more thoughts


The 463 page prospectus is quite an interesting read. Especially the sections about liquidity and the German sub are interesting. That’s good news for German clients of Unicredit (including me), although maybe not for Unicredit.

Market value listed Subsidiaries

I find it quite interesting, if one looks at the listed subsidiaires of Unicredit.

The 59% stake in Polish bank Pekao is worth 4.9 bn, the 84% in Zagrbacka 1.5 bn EUR and the indirectly owned 40 in Yapi around 2 bn EUR. That makes 8.4 bn EUR. This is roughly 1.5 bvn EUR more than the current market cap of Unicredit (shares + rights) before the 7.5 bn EUR cash injection.

If one believes thath the value of Unicredit increases by the amount of the cash injection, then all the Unicredit businesses (Germany, Italy etc.) are valued implictly at -1.5 bn EUR.

Hedging instruments

There seems to be a traded short Mini Future for Intesa, however trading is thin and spreads are wide.

If one hedeges with the FTSE MIB or the MSCI Italy, one should be aware, that ENI and ENEL are ~40% of the index. So the “hedge” is basically a short on the Italien energy sector.

Delta hedging book runners

One part of the selling pressure which acts procyclical could be delta hedging of the underwriters. Their backstop at 1.94 EUR is basically a 2 week put option they gave to unicredit.

At “issuence”, i.e. announcement, the Delta of this option was around 3% (based on actual vola), currently the delta is ~-19%. If the bookrunners delta hedge, then they have to sell (short) more and more shares if the price goes down. This would also explain the lending fees for UCG shares which are currently around 5% p.a. (vs. 10 bpos in normal times).

Of course this also works the other way round, if the price goes up, the bookrunners have to buy shares. So the fixed underwriting commitment could be one of the reasons for the huge volatility at the moment.


  • Pingback: Are Eurozone Equities good value (Part 2) « valuestockinquisition

  • Thanks for making that clear, thought those were fair values estimates by auditors. Well this way it seems to be attractive, if there just would not be all this Italy and banking business within Uni Credit 😉

  • Concerning the pressure on the stock, one should also take into account that there are news impacting UniCredits business such as the near-default of Hungary. This may – at least – affect its Bank Austria business and very likely also the other Eastern Europe subsidiaries. Therefore the fair values stated in the prospectus may sooner or later be maculature.

    • #stairway,

      the market values of the subs are CURRENT traded market values, sorry for not making this clear. In theory, this should include all the (negative) information about Hungary etc.

      For Unicredit the biggest issue is by the way Kazakstan.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.