This is a somewhat “off-topic” post but at the end there will be a turn to investing, I promise !!!
A Swiss magazine published an article on the Weekend, where a “Data scientist” claimed that a method that he developed had made Donald Trump President.
This method, which claims to identify (and of course influence) people by 5 basic character traits was used by a company called “Cambridge Analytica” in order to secure Trump’s victory. And by the way, they were responsible for Brexit too. The article seems to be quite popular, I received the link 5 times over the weekend from very different sources
There are a couple of Youtube videos about Cambridge Analytica, for instance here. But there is a longer one which is more interesting
In the video from September, they are claiming that they managed to make Senator Cruz popular from scratch. They also claim that they can segment down to very small groups and deliver them the right message in a way that will more or less “guarantee” results. As an example they showed how they targeted very small sub groups in Iowa with targeted ads about guns to make them vote for Cruz in the caucus.
How to read a book like your life depends on it (h/t Abnormal Returns)
Some very intelligent thoughts on Board of Director’s independence
Great interview with Dan Ariely about motivation
A great Podcast on really durable businesses
Bloomberg story on the man who invented LIBOR
John Hempton (Bronte) likes Adidas
Some years ago I introduced a 27 point “beta version” of an investment check list. This check list contained a lot of quantitative aspects, such as P/E, P/B or other multiples as well as some qualitative aspects. I used this as a rough guideline for analyzing potential long-term holdings but I found out that the quantitative aspects in a check list are not very helpful, because it leads to discarding really well run companies at a very early stage.
On the qualitative side however some things were missing, especially how a company is run for me became more and more important over the past years.
I think this aspect is not well covered by many other investors as most concentrate (only) on the “what”:
- What moat does a company have ?
- What industry are they in ?
- What ROE/ROIC/EBIT Margin does the company generate ?
- At what EPS/EBIT/Book multiples does the stock trade ?
- What is the “Magic Formula” that generates Alpha without actually looking into the companies I invest
For me the “what” in many cases is actually only a secondary result of the “how”. Moats for instance are not created out of thin air.
Provident Financial is a UK-based “financial service provider”. What makes Provident “special” is that the company is extremely profitable:
Market Cap 4,2 bn GBP
Among its shareholders there are many “famous” investors for instance Marathon AM, Neil Woodford and Tweedy Brown.Stock analysts are quite bullish, according to Bloomberg 9 out of 12 have the company as “buy”, although the target price at 31,00 is only a few percent higher than the current price.
The stock has done pretty well over the last years, “the great financial crisis” had almost no impact on the share price:
The Pixar / Steve Jobs story
Bloomberg story about the “uber quant” hedge fund Renaissance Technologies
Hilton Hotel is going to split into 3 companies
Stock Buybacks in Europe seem to have lost their magic
Wexboy celebrates 5 years of blogging as well as Alpha Vulture. Keep it up guys !
“How I built this” podcast – Herb Kelleher & Southwest Airlines (via Valueinvestingworld)
A very interesting piece on Mark Zuckerberg and how he runs Facebook
I think it is no exaggeration to say that Clayton Christensen is THE management guru on innovation. His first book, “The innovator’s dilemma” is a must read classic management book.