Category Archives: What we read

Some links

Tom Ward (Chesapeake and Sandrigde) has no good words for the oil E&P business.

Bill Gates recommends 5 books to read this summer.

Interesting chart how bank profits and interest rates are correlated (or not..)

Thanks to a comment I discovered a relatively new but promising blog: Valuetradeblog

Nils has two updates, one on Hargreaves Services, the other on Vitec

There is  a new biography out about the founder of Iscar (bought by Berkshire some years ago)

Frank has a good post on our pilgrimage to Mecca ahhh Omaha this year

 

 

Book review: “Elon Musk: Tesla, SpaceX, and the Quest for a Fantastic Future”

51huql08bgl-_sx329_bo1204203200_

I have to admit that before I read the book, I had a deep dislike for Elon Musk. I am not a big fan of egomaniac super star CEOs to put it mildly.

Over the years I followed Tesla but not in much detail, I always thought it is just a big hype. But recently I had the chance to catch a ride with a Model S and was very positively surprised. So as part of my vacation book package I downloaded the Elon Musk biography.

What did I learn from the book ?

1. Elon Musk was not the founder of Paypal. He was the founder of X.com which merged with Paypal. This turned him into a big shareholder and he made a lot of money but technically Paypal was not his idea.

2. His goal for life is to bring people to Mars because he is afraid that the Earth at some point in time is uninhabitable. That’s why he founded SpaceX. Tesla and SolarCity are more like an “accident”. Hi heart is in SpaceX.

3. At work level, he seems to be a real Axxxxxx, he fired his 10+ years personal assistant because she wanted a pay raise. I am not sure if you need to be such an idiot to be successful. However after Steve Jobs’ success many tech founders seem to think so.

4. He does scientific mindset and understands a lot of the technology. He never accepts the status quo similar to Steve Job’s “reality distortion” ability. For some reason, reality often follows his wishes. One example for instance is his insistence to use normal, uncertificated tech for SpaceX rockets instead of expensive, certificated stuff. Everyone said it wouldn’t work but it did.

5. Reading the book, it is clearly that he is a very dedicated guy who got much farther than anyone else thought, both with SpaceX and Tesla. In both cases he challenged fundamentally how things are done.

6. Nevertheless I would still never invest in one of his ventures. He always moves “on the edge” and the financial crises almost killed everything he had. There is little “margin of Safety” in what he does.

Overall, after reading the biography I still think that Elon Musk is still an egomaniac and also narcistic founder/CEO but I do now have much more respect of his achievements. And if he comes up

The book itself is written quite well. It starts slow with a lot of (in my view not very interesting) childhood stuff but then gets much better. Overall I definitely can recommend it as one of the better CEO biographies I have read over the years.

 

 

.

Some links

Tough year: Leucadia’s 2015 shareholder letter

Though year, too: Loews 2015 shareholder letter and  annual report

Kerrisdale Q4 letter with a snapshot of insurance broker Brown & Brown

Great Ted interview with Linus Torvald (creator of Linux)

Former coal giant Peanody filed for bancruptcy protection

Swiss watch makers are still waiting for a recovery

A quick look into the complicated Energy Transfer /Williams NatGas pipeline merger 

 

Some links

No quick fixes for American Express ? And a good post from Punchcard blog on Amex and competition.

Interested in Australian stocks ? Try the Forager Fund blog and the fund reports.

Good post on Italian stocks (Finmeccanica, Piaggio, CIR)

Damodaran on negative interest rates and valuation

The story of “fracking pioneer” Aubrey McClendon

Muddy Waters has updated its Casino short thesis (h/t Valuewalk)

Book review: “Quality Investing: Owning the best companies for the long term”

51no3do9zcl-_sx329_bo1204203200_

“Quality Investing” is one of the growing number of books from Asset Managment firms where they outline their philosophy. I have reviewed already 2 of them, “Capital Returns” from Marathon Asset Managament and “Simple but not easy” from Oldfield Partners.

“Quality Investing” is about London based AKO Capital Management, a company with currently around 9 bn USD under management. The book itself was written by Lawrence Cunningham, a guy who is often described as a “Warren Buffet” expert.

As the title of the book says, AKO focuses on “High Quality” businesses which they intend to own for the long term. A “High Quality” business in their view is defined as a business which can earn high return on capital for a long period of time. In their view, such companies are often undervalued even if they are more expensive than market averages.

The book then walks through different aspects of how to identify “quality”. According to them they look for:

  • Capital allocation (Growth Capex, R&D, M&A, Dividends, buybacks, working capital)
  • Return on capital (asset turns, Gross profit margins)
  • growth (market share, geograhic expansion, Cyclical growth)
  • Management (Discipline, long term orientiation, communication)
  • Industry structure (Barriers to entry, Oligopol, rationality, obscurity)
  • Customer benefits (intangible, Convenience, customer types)
  • Competitive advantages (technology, network effects,distribution
  • Revenue type (Recurring, upfront, licenses, service model, subscriptions, network density)
  • the “friendly middleman”
  • Toll roads (gold standard, “Magic” ingredients)
  • Low Price plus (price vs.differentiation,scale, low cost squared)
  • Pricing power
  • Brand strength (Heritage, Trust & consistency, scale)
  • Innovation
  • Forward integration (own stores, Franchising, online presence)
  • Market share gainers
  • Global cpabilities
  • Corporate culture (trustworthiness, long term orientation, execution, family ownership)
  • Cost to replicate

Companies they like are:

L’Oreal, Diageo, Geberit, Assa Abloy, Handelsbanken, Unilever, H&M, Inditex, Luxottica, Rolls Royce, Atlas Copco, SGS, Intertek, John Deere, Syngenta; Wärtsilä, Kone, Chr. Hansen, Ryanair, Hermés, Novo Nordisk, Nike; Fielmann, Experian

What makes the book authentic is the chapter about “pitfalls” and some case studies where they made mistakes. According to them, the most important pitfalls are

  • cyclicality (flow products, customer cyclicality, long period swells)
  • technical innovation
  • dependency (Government, stakeholder concentration)
  • Shifting cutomer preferences (fashion risk, good enough substitutes)

They mention specifically Saipem and Tesco where they lost money and Safilo, Nobel Biocare and Nokia for “quality” companies who fell into those pitfalls.

The final section of the book looks at implementation of a “high quality” strateegy and especially the challenges

  • Long term compounding vs short term pressure (short term underperfomance)
  • qualitative judgements vs. “big data”
  • dull businesses
  • Top down mistakes
  • overconfidence
  • too much debt
  • “boiling frog” problem (owning companies for too long if things go bad slowly)
  • changes to the market place (Wincor Nixdorf)
  • Accounting red flags (Elekta)
  • Endowment effect (Emotional connection)

Overall I do think the book is quite good. I would recommend it especially for people who think about migrating from a more “Graham” based approach of value investing to a “Late Buffett/Munger” style.

For those investors who are already deep in “Munger territory”, the book will not present many new ideas but is maybe a good summary of many concepts. The book is also a great basis to build a “Quality check list”.

For me personally the chapters about industry characteristics and customer benefits were most interesting as I haven’t paid a lot attention to this.

Quibbles:

The only quibble I have is that they claim in the books many times that quality companies are not trading a the premium that would be justified. However, they do avoid mentioning anything quantitative, i.e. what premiums they are looking for and how they calculate it.

Of course they need to keep some of their “secret sauce” in order to justify the fees they are charging but as it is the book to me is kind of incomplete. As it is, the book is basically more like a “check list” with explanations than a real “investing book”.

Summary:

As described above, for anyone who wants to get into a more “late Buffett/Munger” style of investing, this is a very good book. Especially if you are looking to build a check list for assesing the quality of companies, this is a great start.

If you look for a “fully fledged” investment book, an important part (valuation) is missing. If I would need to decide between this book and Marathon’s Capital Returns, I think I would go for the latter.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

« Older Entries Recent Entries »